Wednesday, February 8, 2012

The Boston Review and the Future of Black Politics: Irrelevance? Obsolete? Multiracial? Dead?

The Boston Review's January issue focuses on black politics. For those not in the know, the Boston Review is an amazing publication and is one of the last long form newspapers or magazines which brings together real experts to meditate on issues of public concern. In short, the Boston Review is a treasure for those who like to think and reflect on the topics of the day, and to get one step ahead of a very narrow, corporate media driven, news cycle.

The Future of Black Politics issue has the following question on its cover: Is Black Politics Good for America? My response to such inquiries has always been, "is white politics good for America?" As a student of black politics I am always suspicious when "our" concerns are racialized, and those of other folks taken to be "normal" or "mainstream." That assumption explains so much about the challenges which face black and brown communities in the 21st century. I remain puzzled that it has not been more thoroughly interrogated.

Michael Dawson, who I have referenced before and hold in the highest regards, is the editor of The Future of Black Politics series. He has brought together some great folks who are a who's who in political science, sociology, philosophy, and critical race theory. The bench is really deep. Each essay is more than worth considering on its own merits, but here are a few excerpts which are especially prescient given the conversations we have had here on WARN, and the types of puzzles that will have to be worked through as black political elites resolve their roles in an increasingly diverse America.

Michael Dawson, offers a great framework for the essays which follow his introduction. Dawson's following observation about "pragmatic utopianism" is particularly powerful and provocative:
We must “tell no lies, claim no easy victories,” Amílcar Cabral, the Guinea-Bissauan nationalist leader, said of the process of imagining new worlds. We need to understand the conditions from which we must build. So we need a pragmatic utopianism, which starts where we are and imagines where we want to be.
Pragmatic utopianism is not new to black radicalism. King and the civil rights movement combined a utopian image of a very different America, one they were repeatedly told was impossible to obtain, with hardheaded political realism and goal-oriented strategies.
Indeed, King’s Memphis campaign to support black sanitation workers, and, even more so, the Poor People’s Campaign that he was about to launch at the time of his death, were designed explicitly to take on what Walter Mosley has called the “voracious maw of capitalism,” achieve economic justice for all, and in the process build the interracial unity that had been, and remains, so elusive.
Dorian Warren, superstar that he is (I mean that with love), contributes a trenchant observation about the relationship between neoliberalism, vested interests, and black empowerment:
Incompatible and irreconcilable interests among blacks represent the fundamental challenge of 21st-century black politics. While black communities have always had a class divide, its sources have changed. Under Jim Crow segregation, black economic elites depended on black consumers, tethering black capitalists to the larger black community.
Drawing on a term Dawson uses elsewhere, that business arrangement created a sense of “linked fate.” Today, black economic elites not only have sources of income and wealth outside the black community, but their collective interests are at odds with those of the majority of black Americans. There is no going back.
I’m not as optimistic as Dawson about the chances that black political leaders will begin to represent all segments of black communities, particularly poor or LGBT people. It is equally likely that black political elites will continue to engage in processes of secondary marginalization. Indeed things could get worse. After all, black mayors and other mayors of color—in Oakland, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and elsewhere—have behaved no differently, and often worse, than their white counterparts in responding to Occupy protests.
Lani Guinier and Gerald Torres develop their previous concept of "political race" one step further and suggest that:
...In each of these cases, blacks and Latinos linked their fates with other disenfranchised groups who share similar economic and social status or worldview, but who are separated from them and from each other by the old scripts of racial division. The goal of these political-race projects is to build constituencies of accountability rather than constituencies for electability.
We applaud Dawson’s critique: the road to political power is not through the electocracy. Rather than focusing on electing more black candidates, black progressives should build political or social movements that assert their authority beyond the voting booth and offer a better vision of what this country could be. But we believe they cannot do it alone. Political race is necessary to change the wind.
Philosopher Tommie Shelby bring the heat with a claim about black political leadership that I am sure many of you will agree with:
Dawson insists that we need independent black organizations if we are to hold black leaders accountable. But black elected officials could be held accountable through elections if we had a more democratic system, one that didn’t give rich people and large corporations undue influence over elections and public policy. This suggests that blacks should join forces with those fighting for a fairer electoral system and campaign finance reform, regardless of their race. We of course need well-run organizations able to pressure government officials.
But again, these organizations can be racially diverse, with each member an equal. Self-appointed spokespersons for “the race” are obsolete—they don’t need to be held accountable; they need to be delegitimized...
Dawson rightly praises King’s pragmatic utopianism, and he recommends a return to the spirit and politics of King’s underappreciated Where Do We Go from Here. But Dawson seems not to have taken to heart the lessons from King’s trenchant critique of black power ideology.
Cultivating multiracial organizations and maintaining black solidarity within them strikes the right balance between utopian aspiration and political realism. Black politics need not be anchored in a set of organizations that blacks control. It can and should be rooted in blacks’ joint ethical commitment to protect each other and to fight for justice and mutual respect.
My thoughts on these matters are mixed.

On one hand, I suggest that we still need vibrant, strong, well-resourced black political, economic, and cultural organizations to argue for the particular, and in many cases, "unique" needs of the African American community given our history and present in the United States. However, to the degree that black folks are still possessed by the glare of the glorious 1960s and the civil rights moment, we are unable to shift gears and deal with current challenges where class often matters more than race in explaining deleterious life outcomes.

In the Age of Obama white supremacy is institutionalized. However, it operates in a race neutral fashion. Old tactics for dealing with racism in the neoliberal, neoconservative, global present are the equivalent of the Zulus charging British Gatling guns, or the horses of the Light Brigade charging headlong into Maxim machine guns. In all, you will have a great story to tell. However, the victory--if it comes--will be Pyrrhic in nature. The white racial frame, the white gaze, and white supremacy are adaptive. In many ways, they are among the greatest inventions of the modern age. Black and brown people, our allies, and others interested in the common good need to shift to full spectrum warfare in order to defeat those enemies. Nothing less will bring continued defeat.

Finally, I am also nervous about handing over the political interests of black people to the ambiguous umbrella term known as "multiracial" alliances. Cooperation does not preclude the pursuit of one's own narrow group interests. However, history has taught many lessons--among them how black folks are often at the vanguard of challenging the system and teaching others how to struggle--only to see African American political interests discarded in the interest of "political expediency" or the "greatest good for the greatest many."

Where do we go from here? You tell me.


Anonymous said...

Yawn...Tired of the usual suspects in Black Intellectual/Academia been on this tour to many times

These people talented as they are do not have any currency on the streets and avenues of Black America..

Of course in the lanes of life they navigate in it is incumbent that Black voices be heard but other than that none of the figures have really altered the landscape of daily life for most of Black America..

chaunceydevega said...

@Anon. Pray tell. Who has altered "have really altered the landscape of daily life for most of Black America.." as of late?

CNu said...

Ricky Ross...,

Anonymous said...


Many of these folks...Black social workers,Black probation officers, pastors,and of course Black parents, family and friends who daily make a difference in the lives of most Black Americans..

chaunceydevega said...

@Anon. As do black educators. We can't forget the historic role they have played. And their continued--if not more so-relevance in the present.

Michael said...

I was surprised that no one mentioned SNCC and the repercussions of the expulsion of white leaders in that group. It seems like there ought to be some lessons we can learn from that.

Anonymous said...


I agree Black educators also have a significant role in the vanguard. From my vantage point their voices share the space.

I affirm parity based advocacy which is why I found Shelbly's remarks refreshing..

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]My response to such inquiries has always been, "is white politics good for America?" As a student of black politics I am always suspicious when "our" concerns are racialized[/quote]

Mr DeVega:

When I read your work at times I believe that you are having an "out of body experience" with your own content.

The content on this web site prove once and for all - "There IS NO 'Black Progressive Politics' or 'White Progressive Politics' There is only PROGRESSIVE-FUNDAMENTALIST Politics".

QUICK - Tell me one distinctive position that you hold from your BBFs Ed Schultz and the lawyer "P"?

You have it wrong in your last sentence above.

The problem IS NOT that "Black people's concerns have been RACIALIZED.

The problem is that when Black people concerns are POLITICIZED.

You and Sharpton have a master's degree in such trix.

When the concerns of Detroit were front and center - instead of DEFENDING THE BLACK INTERESTS - over the past 30 years as the city declined and our people suffered - we now see these, the Embedded Confidence Men asking the Black congregation to PROTECT the Black Progressive elected leaders in power because the state Republicans aim to overturn what the BLACK VOTERS wanted.

BUT WAIT, BUT WAIT - when the majority of Black voters supported Proposition 8 in California when the judges voided their vote last week these same "Keepers of the People's Will".........................

Do you see, Mr DeVega - few people have watched your antics, unafraid of being called a "racist or Tom" and upon stitching it all together make a picture that looks like one of Picasso's abstractions.

Have you done a "self-breast exam" lately bro?

chaunceydevega said...

@Constructive. you heart is in the right place. it is simply that your deft use of metaphor is too much for us simple folk to comprehend.

no, i did not do a breast self-examination, however, you did help me examine these nuts. sorry, couldn't resist the reference to jiggling testes, Too Short, and 2 Live Crew.

be careful, highlighters are very dangerous.

Constructive Feedback said...

Now now Mr DeVega - no homosexual fantasies at my expense. "Not that there is anything wrong with that" BUT not with me. If you choose another brother and he is "bout it bout it" there is little that I care to do to stop you.

[quote] "is white politics good for America?"[/quote]

** Is the methodology that the majority of Black People have chosen for our Community development EFFECTIVE??

** Do Black people make a distinction between "Being MADE in receipt of benefit via social justice" AND USING the INSTITUTIONS of our community to develop our people to support the desired standard of living?

** Is there any mechanism WITHIN the Black community by which Black people can measure the effectiveness of what has been popularly chosen and agree to change direction DESPITE the popularity of TRYING HARDER at the same thing?

Certainly there is no need to talk about male genitalia in pondering these important basic questions, Mr DeVega.

Does it bother you that you have more angry disagreements with ME a Black man than I have EVER, EVER heard you register with Mr Schultz and Mr P?

I'd swear that I had enslaved your ancestors the way you treat me some times.

chaunceydevega said...

@Constructive. I like you. If I didn't I would just ignore you. So, let's try again. I have an idea. How about you come up with 5 basic questions for me and I will answer them in a post. I will do the same for you and post them. Agreed?