What do White Supremacists and Black Nationalists Have in Common? Raising Young Boys to Become "Mindweapons" and "Black Warrior Kings"

When I was in college and going to the Black Man Think Tanks, "black manhood" retreats, and exploring black cultural nationalism, one of my mentors had come up with a proposal to establish learning academies in the country's central cities.

He was an old school brother who came of age in the late 1960s. He also sincerely believed that the black community was in disarray because of a failure of the black family and a crisis in black masculinity. As he repeatedly told me and his other students, black manhood is imperiled. How are black boys going to learn how to be proper men when there are no proper examples to learn from?

I still think he was more right than wrong, much in the same way that Patrick Moynihan was more right than wrong too.

In the manhood academies uniforms would be mandatory--they looked like Afrocentric versions of the Power Rangers mixed with Sun-man. The curriculum would be focused on science, mathematics, the martial arts, and history. And of course, this would be a same sex environment. He also had plans for female academies modeled on the Nation of Islam's schools for Muslim girls.

Ultimately, my friend had approached a number of large foundations and they were quite interested in his plan. The rest is history: he is now a multimillionaire who made his money buying and rehabing defunct strip malls and shopping centers instead of saving The People.

I frequent a number of white supremacist websites. For all of the white victimology bluster and racial pseudo-science, there is a frightening level of focus and coordination among the White Right. These people are dangerous and prepared. They are also thinking of practical solutions to social problems and social disorganization in ways that are not common among political centrists and other establishment types.

The level of coordination by the White Right is most certainly not seen among what remains of the former civil rights establishment and the various "progressive" groups that supposedly speak for people of color.

The following comment echoes much of what I heard years ago during the Black Nationalist resurgence of the late 1980s and early 1990s. If one changes the racial language, the White Right's idea of cultivating "white genius" parallels the conversations that used to take place among black and brown race men and race women of a bygone era.  And the proposals for STEM academies that also teach lessons about "manhood" are still popular in many communities today.

Black nationalists. White Supremacists. Who would have thought that they could be brothers (or maybe cousins) from another mother?

****

Hipster Racist says:

March 1, 2013 at 4:44 pm

MW, I don’t mean to derail the conversation, but to respond seriously and specifically to your idea:

In this high tech world, it’s just a numbers game of raising White genius. If we manage to raise 1000 kids (my estimate) with solid math science foreign language training, from aggregated homeschools (collections of homeschools in an area like Kalispell), we’ll get a Steve Jobs or a Henry Ford out of those 1000, as well as hundreds of high wage earners and, even more important, parents of Mind Weapons.

… But we have to work collectively to make this happen. We will need to gather in specific areas, and pool our resources.

I’m not bringing up the man/woman thing for anything to do with dating, or gaming your wife, or sex, or polygamy or any such thing. I’m saying is that any “collective pooling of resources” it’s going to be easier when it’s a group of men. I’m saying that of your 1000 young STEM genuises, 85%+ of them are going to be boys. Your titans of the 1000 will be men. Intense STEM schooling is, generally speaking, going to have to come from teachers who are men.

Instead of a loose collective of “family values homeschools” you’d be better off with a boy’s STEM academy. If you want to organize 1000 Mindweapons families, you’d be better off collecting 1000 White men, and letting them be in charge of dealing with their family.

Any economic cooperation is going to have to be between men – unless you want your wife and some random WN guy to be meeting and discussing how to spend your money? LOL I don’t think so.

If you want a collective that cooperates to gain power, the nodes of the network should be men, not families, not couples. To be effective, you need a hierarchy. Do you want your wife or daughter being the subordinate of, and taking orders from, some WN man that outranks her? Of course not. Women do not fit into men’s hierarchy, anymore than you fit in at your wife’s sewing circle or baby shower.

The Kalispell Boy’s STEMM (Science Technology Engineering Math Military) Academy – the training grounds of the future Mannerbund – is the model that works. Those boys will easily dominate boys from home schools taught by mom and the local pastor’s wife.

FWIW, I do think the majority of the future graduates of Kalispell Boy’s STEMM will be perfectly happy with one wife and a normal family life. They will be in a position to find a higher quality wife, too.

Putting our energy into boys and men will pay off greater and quicker dividends than pretending we’re all equal, or that creating a future for White children is somehow not primarily the responsibility of White men.

You could find plenty of White women that would make effective White warriors and STEMM workers. You could also find plenty of White men that would make great house husbands and nannies. The great Thorstein Veblen once said that the reason butlers are tall, strong, intelligent, masculine men is because it shows how rich you are that you can afford to waste his natural masculine talents on pouring your tea and drawing you a bath – just like how some Aztec warlord proves his wealth by breaking something valuable at the celebration.

So our anti-White regime loves to waste the natural talents of valuable women – motherhood and the Home – on competing with men in the workplace, working office jobs, squandering their youth on Sex and the City lifestyles. It shows just how rich they are – they can afford to pay your wife more than you can!